What I wrote in True Stories of CSI

In recent seasons of C.S.I., several episodes featured the clever and elusive “Miniatures Killer.”  This offender planned murders in great detail and created tiny but exacting replicas of each crime scene.  While many people ask me how much of C.S.I. is based on actual cases, they query most often about this unique series of episodes.  I’m always delighted to say that the Miniatures Killer is based on reality – not on the work of an offender but on the vision of an innovative heiress who created the “dollhouses of death” as teaching instruments for police officers.  As is often the case, a true story inspired the C.S.I. creators and they added their fictional spin.  

Because viewers are often curious about what really happened in some incident, I collected the actual cases that inspired many episodes and wrote True Stories of C.S.I. (Berkley 2008).  One of the 25 chapters is devoted to the woman behind the dollhouses, while others describe such notorious offenders as Richard Trenton Chase, Michael Peterson, and Richard Speck, as well as such headline-grabbing incidents as the “rebirthing” homicide in Colorado, the JonBenét Ramsey murder, and our modern-day body-snatchers.

I learned about Frances Glessner Lee when I was researching the history of forensic science for Beating the Devil’s Game.  She was the only woman who had made a serious contribution to the field, and she did so against the wishes of her wealthy parents.  Indeed, her contribution was so unique and generous she became the first woman invited into the fledgling organization, the American Academy of Forensic Science, and was made an honorary member of the International Association of the Chiefs of Police.

Frances was the daughter of John Jacob Glessner and heir to the International Harvester fortune.  During the early 1900s, she aspired to study law or medicine, but her father forbade her from attending a university.  Off went her older brother to Harvard, where he met George Burgess Magrath, who hoped for a career in pathology.  Magrath often visited the Glessners at their thousand-acre New Hampshire estate, where he mesmerized Frances, a fan of Sherlock Holmes, with stories about death investigation.  Once he became a medical examiner, he confided to her the need for solid training for death investigators. She asked what she could do and Magrath encouraged her to assist with developing a prestigious flagship program at Harvard.

In 1931, Lee provided an endowment and library for Harvard’s Department of Legal medicine.  But then she did more.  She knew that inexperienced police officers often committed errors when trying to determine manner of death, largely due to missing the clues, so to mitigate this, she devised a practical solution: build crime scenes on which they could practice – in miniature.  She dubbed her project the “Nutshell Studies of Unexplained Death.”  Setting aside the second floor of her mansion as a workshop, she filled one room with doll-size furniture.  Then she hired two fulltime carpenters to craft the small buildings.  From cabins to three-room apartments to garages, each was fashioned to scale from her design.  The doors and windows actually worked, with shades that rolled up and working locks with mini-keys. 

They built three Nutshells per year, each of which cost the same as an average house in those days.  Lee made the dolls by hand, using a cloth body stuffed with cotton BB gun pellets and bisque heads. She painted the faces and stitched the clothes, adding sweaters and socks knitted on straight pins. Once each doll was ready, Lee would decide just how it should “die” and proceed to stick a knife in one, drown another, or hang one in a noose.  On each, she would paint decomposition.

To create each crime diorama, she blended several stories, sometimes going with police officers to crime scenes or the morgue, sometimes reading reports in the newspapers, and often injecting fiction.  She preferred enigmatic scenarios, where one had to examine all the clues before deciding on a conclusion.

Once Lee had several dollhouses ready, she made them part of the weeklong law enforcement seminars she sponsored at Harvard twice a year.  One day of each seminar was set aside for work with the Nutshells.  Participants had limited time to look at each crime scenario, take notes, and report back to the others about the evidence they saw. By the time Lee finished her ambitious project, she had nineteen Nutshells. 

In each scene, she included items that were not readily apparent, such as a subtle smudge of lipstick on a pillow slip. What might seem to be a suicide, for example, would look different when a key item was noted – a fresh-baked cake and a load of freshly-laundered clothing beside a woman’s body on the kitchen floor.  Other scenarios included a bound prostitute with a sliced throat and a man hanging in a wooden cabin.

By 1949, some 2,000 doctors and 4,000 lawyers had been educated at the Harvard Department of Legal Medicine, and several thousand state troopers, detectives, coroners, district attorneys, insurance agents, and crime reporters had attended Lee’s seminars.  They would continue successfully for several more years before the Nutshells were transferred to the Office of the Medical Examiner in Baltimore, MD.  After Lee died, her friend, Erle Stanley Gardner (author of the Perry Mason series), wrote, “Captain Lee had a strong individuality, a unique, unforgettable character, was a fiercely competent fighter, and a practical idealist.”  She is truly a role model for females in forensics today and C.S.I. is to be credited for renewing interest in her accomplishments.

My latest book, September 2008

My latest book, September 2008


Tags: , , , ,

5 Responses to “What I wrote in True Stories of CSI”

  1. Ripley Says:

    Your books are fantastic and I can’t get enough. This latest was captivating and left me sitting on the edge of my seat.

    I’m currently trying to explain how one would go about creating a behavioral science unit in a mid-size law enforcement agency for my psychology for law enforcement class and I’m stumped on what staff should make up such a unit. Should they all be sworn officers/psychologists or what? Any advice?


  2. indianni Says:

    Thank you. I appreciate it.

    Think from the bottom up – start with the crime scene and victimology. Then think about what resources you have. The fewer the resources, the more generic the team’s skills should be. Clearly, you need law enforcement. You could retain a forensic psychologist on an as-needed basis or you could have officers go to the FBI’s National Academy and get training in profiling. Or hire a consultant to teach the rudimentaries of behavioral analysis and have one person on the team be in charge of keeping up with this type of training.

  3. Ripley Says:

    Thank you Dr. Ramsland! For the quick response and for all you do to inspire me!

  4. Donna Brennan Says:

    I attended your session at the glvwg writers conference, and I met you at a workshop at one of their meetings recently. I enjoyed both the session and the workshop very much. Forensics is an area that has long fascinated me, although that’s not where I feel called to write.

    I’m writing you now to see if you can refer someone to me who might be able to help my son. He’s involved in the GATES program (Gifted And Talented Educatin honors Seminar) at the Bangor Area High School. For his project, he needs to write about a career area he’s interested in and then “job shadow” someone in that field for one day. The field he’s interested in is Forensics.

    Do you know anyone in the field of forensics who would be willing to let a tenth grader follow them around for a day to observe as they do their job?

    If you don’t have a paticular person you can suggest, do you know who I would approach (like local police, or a particular governmen office) to try to find someone who migh be willing to help out?

    Thank you so much for any advice you can give me.

  5. indianni Says:

    It’s dicey at that age. I would only allow a senior into my class, myself, but you might ask your local police department. I doubt he could get into a forensics lab, but they might let him see something else. Good luck.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: